The best position would probably be opposing the two rear saucer ones. Despite HOW the ship starts moving, the laws of physics mean that once the engines are off, the ship still goes forward at the same velocity until an opposing force halts the motion. It is in fact impossible to keep anything absolutely still in a non-gravitational environment, but adding the braking engines (the retro rockets you sometimes hear mentioned in real space travel) can help slow the ship when needed. I assume the technobabble explaination in Trek would be that the rear impulse engines simply invert the field or something, but that is inefficient, slower and dangerous at the high speeds used.
go ahead, put on in on the front. It would save the thursters trouble. But since it runs off of plasma that's generated by a fusion reactor, the coil does not have to be anywhere near the exaust. so you don't have to modify your drawing, because they could just route the plasma from the reaction chambers to the coil in the front. They would not have to put a seperate reaction chamber in the front.
That would solve energy problems, but what about staffing problems. How many additional engineers would need to be on board to service three different cores? I am not sure if this is a serious issue, just something I am curious about.
Actually, I am thinking of what Engineering would look like with three cores, all arranged in a kind of pyramid of power. It would be interesting.
Last Edit: Jun 23, 2006 18:40:55 GMT by davidramsey
Well, the multiple cores is an intruging idea, not to be dismissed lightly. There is a chance that it could work with certain protocols and restrictions ... it could be a great new concept that would seem fitting on a prototype ship.
It all depends on how you plan to deploy each core ... one for enhanced sensor range, one for general propulsion and one to operate all main systems. I imagine the engines would be smaller and buildt for maximum efficency to circumvent the unnecessary waste of materials. In an emergency situation I imagine all the cores' power could be diverted to whatever system needed them. It could prove to be a valuable change in the long run.
It's not a matter just of safety, but the fact it is both inefficient and unnecessary. A single warp core is capable of powering the whole ship since once the engine drain is taken off then enough remains to run everything else. Unless the engines required far more power than they actually do now then a second source of power is not needed. It only became necessary in early Voyager to ration power because they are a small ship with no obvious means of refuelling and the death of anyone who knew how common deuterium actually is meant they thought it was a huge problem.
An analogy would be putting thee identical engines into a car; it doesn't make you able to go faster, it just requires three times the fuel to achieve the same speed when a single engine with three times the power was needed. As long as backup exists to take over from the main if it fails then there's no problem.
If you really do want more than one, I'd suggest a spare mini one in the saucer since when it's seperate then there's no way for it to run indefinately. Of course it would be too small to power warp, but it wouldn't need to since the saucer is impulse only.
I like the premethus style warp engines my slef Kosh, and I would like to see more of that split formation of the premethues
The obvious flaw of the Prometheus style MVAM was that it required all three sections intact for it to reform. Not a good chance to take when it's a battle ship. Nick Martens (on this site) designed the Vesuvius-A so that it split differently. It doesn't exactly look graceful when split, but it doesn't need to and at least we don't need all the pieces.
The shape of the Prometheus suggests no such thing is possible. Of course it was a prototype class so it is entirely possible later MVAM ships would be made so that not all sections need to be present as on the Martens made Somma class.
And I don't like the whole "One engine for each wheel" reference, because I thought Warp Cores were more like an energy source than propulsion. I got my idea from something I read at Treknology.org
"Higher velocities were possible, but the energy expenditure and the stress to the system components was enormous."
See what I mean? I think smaller warp cores might work though, three cores that are smaller than regular cores. One for the propulstion, one for the systems, and one as a backup core (which is usually off unless needed.)
I don't like aht ideas as an engineer. If you hooked one to each engine, what if one went offline?
YOu could achive the same amount of power with a bigger single core. Voyager has 2 cores, though one is a spare. YOu could do something similar, and also have one to power the saucer.
Or, here's an idea: use warp core power to elctrify the plasma for the impulse drive. Clean and No exaust ports needed.
The multiple cores idea is a nightmare from an engineering perspective. if the ship gets' really big (several times galaxty size) It would make a lot of sense for redundant power adn all that. but the size we're talikg about here, it shouldn't matter.
I remember the TNG episode where it was revealed that conventional warp drive was destroying the galaxy. What if you were running a new engine that was designed to somehow avoid such a thing? I don't think you'd want to chance having the thing short out because you are using it to power too many things, also, you'd certainly want to have a back up plan in case something went wrong. Or there is a chance that such an engine, even a proven model, may not yet be capable of really powering the whole of the ship. You may have the alternative engines to power the ship's systems as well as any extracurricular systems.
Last Edit: Jun 25, 2006 8:07:27 GMT by davidramsey
Post by iantalosarika on Jun 26, 2006 22:55:55 GMT
As I've said, it's not going to be one core for each engine. It's going to be set up like this. Core 1: Shipboard systems Core 2: Propulsion Core 3: Backup core Cores one and two are going to be smaller than most ship cores, and core three is going to be full size, so it can pick up if both cores fail. Standard core operations will have one and two active and three shutdown unless needed.
Edit: And can we drop the subject of the Prometheus class?
Last Edit: Jun 26, 2006 23:00:43 GMT by davidramsey
"Hailing frequencies open"
Savot: A most excellent and momentous hallmark to reach! It's been my honor and privilege; thanks to everyone who's made this place such an integral part of my life for over a decade. I'm sincerely grateful.
May 15, 2020 0:52:58 GMT
Carl Torek: Well, Ladies and Gentlemen ... Section 47 is 'TWENTY YEARS YOUNG' today ... Thank you, everyone, who has put their time, effort, and creative imagination into keeping us going for so long, here's to the next 20 ... ✨✨✨
May 7, 2020 20:42:42 GMT
Matthew Reynolds: Just wanted to take the time and say that it has been a wonderful 15 years here on Section 47. I joined today in 2005. One of the best choices I've made.
Apr 29, 2020 3:26:31 GMT
Gheskori: I echo the comment below, it's a difficult time for all, stay safe everybody
Apr 11, 2020 6:07:04 GMT
CSS: We hope all our members are coping with the stresses and strains during the Pandemic ... Stay safe and well everyone 😷 ... your Command Staff.
Apr 4, 2020 13:43:35 GMT
Matthew Reynolds: I'm back and ready to go crazy. Have had a stupid busy 2020, and then this whole Covid thing is crazy
Mar 18, 2020 16:56:15 GMT
Carl Torek: Hope you had a good holiday, Sir
Feb 21, 2020 23:32:20 GMT
Gheskori: Hi all I'm back from my holiday and have caught up with my home life lol. I'm aiming to post for a char or two tomorrow Thursday so can declare myself fully back on board.
Feb 20, 2020 2:09:48 GMT
Carl Torek: Well, after over three years of being stranded, we are beginning to explore a means to return home. Our efforts can be read on the 'Wormhole' thread on the Starbase Board ... Loving the activity ... Fingers crossed everyone
Feb 14, 2020 12:58:10 GMT
Carl Torek: Hello Max, yes, we're still in here
Jan 22, 2020 1:41:28 GMT
Max Richards: Hello everyone! I am pleasantly surprised this page is still up and running
Jan 21, 2020 17:46:44 GMT
Carl Torek: Good to hear Savot, welcome to the party
Jan 16, 2020 18:03:34 GMT
Savot: Greetings all; wanted to report in that I've caught up reading the Wormhole thread and intend to make the El Salvador's initial post in it tomorrow.
Jan 15, 2020 2:10:18 GMT
Carl Torek: Hey Matt, Real Life has to come first and gets you at times, as we all know. Great to see you back
Jan 11, 2020 12:12:05 GMT
Matthew Reynolds: Sorry guys, life was beating me up. I'm back
Jan 11, 2020 3:45:01 GMT
Carl Torek: 📌 STARDATES 📌 ... Well Ladies and Gentlemen, we have entered our Twentieth-year ... Here are our new Stardates [for continuity] --- FLEET SIMMING: 2406.04.mmdd / TOS SIMMING: 2266.mmdd ... (Use current month & day)
Jan 9, 2020 16:45:48 GMT
Gheskori: Happy Christmas one and all!
Dec 27, 2019 1:27:15 GMT
Carl Torek: Hi All, hope you are enjoying a fantastic Christmas ... All my best wishes to you all for the coming year 🎄🎉🎄
Dec 25, 2019 22:35:57 GMT
Gheskori: Hi everyone, sorry I meant to post over the weekend but have been visiting family and haven't found time. Not that I've been particularly inactive on here but I'd have liked to have kept to the plan. Will post early in the week. Cheers
Dec 9, 2019 0:20:35 GMT