cptjeff
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by cptjeff on Dec 7, 2005 19:39:15 GMT
I just took a bunch of shots- I'll post them oday hopfully- a few normal veiws, a few details.
|
|
cptjeff
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by cptjeff on Dec 7, 2005 21:58:17 GMT
|
|
ajohnson
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by ajohnson on Dec 7, 2005 22:07:20 GMT
Looks like Galactica to me.
|
|
Deleted
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2005 22:09:34 GMT
Resembles the Akira to me
|
|
cptjeff
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by cptjeff on Dec 7, 2005 22:10:29 GMT
?? i don't follow that series, I don't know what you mean.
Also, it wouldn't be just like that- that's the frame- it would be solid, but hte way k'nex work, solid is virtually impossibele. Imagine that wrapped in tinfoil.
|
|
ajohnson
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by ajohnson on Dec 7, 2005 22:26:05 GMT
|
|
cptjeff
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by cptjeff on Dec 7, 2005 22:37:59 GMT
the only resembance I se is in the naccelle attachment and genral starfleet configuration. (saucer, engineering, nacceles) the pylons are the only thing that look the same to me.
Edit: accually, looing at it again, if you turned that arond and took off the current front section it would look similar....
|
|
ajohnson
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by ajohnson on Dec 7, 2005 23:29:59 GMT
I don't mind the design though. Might not work so well with the Saucer Seperation though.
|
|
cptjeff
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by cptjeff on Dec 8, 2005 2:26:29 GMT
It is a frame... perhaps someone with 3-d modleing could come up with a rough draft and If we liked it we could scetch the location of the separation plane?
|
|
jared
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by jared on Dec 8, 2005 13:59:41 GMT
Seperation sections are generally quite easy to work out; it can be done with a simple mortis and tenon type of connection between one and the other.
Also, do we want nacelles down or nacelles up? Someone said they wanted to keep the classic design.
|
|
cptjeff
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by cptjeff on Dec 8, 2005 14:58:07 GMT
Calsic can mean many things. to me, it means that the tree sections are distinct- saucer, engineering, and the nacceles. a non-traditonal ship would be the defiant or a steamrunner. In my eyes, this is traditional. No extra pods like the nebula has, ecetera. And keep in mind that the second canon ship had underslung nacceles- the Reliant.
So the naccele configuration is traditonal, in my opinion.
|
|
jared
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by jared on Dec 8, 2005 16:32:04 GMT
How many pylons are there supposed to be? Is it four seperate ones like on the Galactica or is it one big joining pylon?
|
|
cptjeff
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by cptjeff on Dec 8, 2005 16:42:13 GMT
I never did figure that out- I've recently been thinking two large ones with a gap in between....
|
|
jared
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by jared on Dec 8, 2005 17:03:39 GMT
I just drew a sketch picture of the dorsal view. If you give me time for photobucket registration to finish then I'll upload it. It's a bit of a small picture because I had to take it with a phone camera.
|
|
Jamey Gaz
Commander 1C
Species: Joined Trill
Registered: Feb 17, 2005 8:15:35 GMT
Posts: 598
|
Post by Jamey Gaz on Dec 8, 2005 18:33:36 GMT
OK ... this is just me playing around in Photoshop with the Sovereign Class ship ... cutin' and a' slicin' to see how a doubled hull ship with four warp nacelles would look I'm not suggesting this ... I simply was wanting to see how the lines would look ... so ... I'm just simply sharing
|
|
cptjeff
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by cptjeff on Dec 8, 2005 18:42:20 GMT
I don't like it too much. the double aucer thing is just too much.... Bulk.
|
|
Deleted
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2005 18:46:21 GMT
|
|
cptjeff
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by cptjeff on Dec 8, 2005 18:48:27 GMT
we had decided we wanted soething traditonal earlyer in the tread... and that's not traditional, nor is it visually attarctive to me.
|
|
ajohnson
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by ajohnson on Dec 8, 2005 19:49:13 GMT
I agree.
|
|
jared
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by jared on Dec 8, 2005 20:00:20 GMT
Unfortunately the camera phone made it a bit too small if you want to see it clearly.
|
|
Jamey Gaz
Commander 1C
Species: Joined Trill
Registered: Feb 17, 2005 8:15:35 GMT
Posts: 598
|
Post by Jamey Gaz on Dec 8, 2005 20:08:56 GMT
I suggest the the arrow like Saucer of the Prometheus class ... I like the size of the secondary hull on your drawing Reman ...
|
|
cptjeff
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by cptjeff on Dec 8, 2005 20:54:36 GMT
Accually, I really like it as sckeched... That's quite well done.
and I don't like the arrow tipped ships. Besides, from an engineering point of veiw, they're in-efficant, due to the natural rounding of warp feilds. Voyager works really quite well in that regard, as does the -e, as they have tipped but not pointed saucers, and they are round to accomodate the warp feild
|
|
jared
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by jared on Dec 8, 2005 21:05:50 GMT
So shall I try a pointed saucer with a rounded tip? It might look a bit too Galactica though.
|
|
Jamey Gaz
Commander 1C
Species: Joined Trill
Registered: Feb 17, 2005 8:15:35 GMT
Posts: 598
|
Post by Jamey Gaz on Dec 8, 2005 21:15:12 GMT
couldn't hurt to at least try it ....
|
|
cptjeff
Guest
Registered: Nov 21, 2024 11:20:57 GMT
|
Post by cptjeff on Dec 8, 2005 21:27:15 GMT
If it's not too much trouble I think it would be interesting to see...
|
|